The language of assessment
Posted by: Mr Mackenzie in Assessment for learning, reflectionBoth S3 classes had a brief glimpse at their survey results today. These were raw results, not filtered by class, so each bar chart shows 40 respondents rather than the 20 you would expect for a science class.
I realised that I had done something stupid in questions 8 & 9, with results that are sufficiently interesting for me to share them. Question 8 asked pupils to rate themselves using the statement
“I know that electrical energy transformed each second =IV”
From the image below, we see that only 50% of my S3 pupils are confident that they know this.

To help non-physicists see what is interesting, I need to explain that
energy transformed each second = power
current has the symbol I
voltage has the symbol V
Armed with this, have a look at the details for question 9 (below) and the responses I received to the statement
“I can perform calculations involving power, current and voltage.”

These two questions are asking the same thing, yet an extra 35% of the pupils felt that they had achieved the learning outcome.
The reason for the difference lies in the language used to express the question. What does this tell me? I think it tells me two things - three things if I include checking the questions before I set them!
First of all, the learning is not as secure as I would like. While pupils might know the relationship that exists between power, current and voltage, they lack a sufficiently deep understanding to put this relationship into context. The second point is that the language we use to frame a question plays a critical role in determining whether or not pupils can provide an answer. How much of the assessment we put children through is a true assessment of the subject area in question and how much is a test of their ability to unpick the language of assessment to identify find the real question underneath?
Entries (RSS)